But if you already know that a specific field will be complex and differentiated and know enough of the upcoming thematic aspects and notes, you can create such a MOC from the start. These MOCs require and imply a certain level and quality of development and differentiation of the thematic field. writings, methodological fundamentals, thematic clusters spanning over different writings). For example there is a MOC for Marx’s Critique of Political Economy where I collect the key aspects of his economic-philosophical thinking (e.g. Here I exclusively place specific thematic focal points (= key aspects of a thematic field). notes (notes on a meta level) that contain nested lists, each is a link to a specific note. Maps of Content (MOCs): For a more systematic (and ›predefined‹) search I use »Maps of Content« (MOCs), i.e.There is also a local graph view that shows only the actual note with its links. This search query can also be applied to the graph view which does an excellent job in giving you orientation (although there are a few feature requests for the graph view pending). So you always search for a tag and all subordinated tags. The advantage in Obsidian is that the search for a superordinated tag implies the subordinated tag levels. My tags are very detailed and deeply nested (at least 4 levels, up to 8 or so). When in general searching in a specific thematic field I search for the favoured tag (simply click in the tag pane) and look at the results.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |